MOBILE

Principle #4: Move beyond myth-busting: Reassure and reframe

Avoid confrontational myth-busting. Frame fluoride asnormal and protective, not something to defend.

When parents raise concerns shaped by misinformation, directly correcting or “debunking” myths can unintentionally reinforce fear. Effective communication focuses on reassurance, framing, and alignment with parental goals- not winning arguments.

Core Behaviour

QuickTalking Tips

Your role is not to win an argument, but to keep parents engaged and confident.

DOThis

(Reframing and reassurance)

Use language that recognises emotion while calmly redirecting the focus:

 

These responses:

AVOIDThis

(Myth-busting and confrontation)

Avoid language that challenges or corrects directly: 

These responses unintentionally:

Standard Chairside Language

“I understand why that sounds concerning. Here’s what we know from strong evidence and how we use fluoride safely for children.”

“Rather than focusing on what’s shared online, let me explain how we use fluoride every day to protect teeth.”

“What’s most important is that we use a small amount and supervise brushing. That’s how fluoride helps without causing problems.”

General Delivery Tips

Non-verbal cues strongly influence whether reassurance is accepted.

Less explanation often builds more confidence.

Less explanation often builds more confidence.

Evidence Base

Health communication research demonstrates that fact-only or confrontational approaches can increase resistance, particularly when concerns are emotionally driven.

Fluoride hesitancy is often shaped by emotionally charged narratives rather than scientific detail.

Avoiding confrontational myth-busting prevents escalation, preserves trust and keeps fluoride framed as protective routine care. This helps clinicians respond confidently without amplifying misinformation.

Research shows that:
  • Directly correcting misinformation can backfire
  • Emotional reassurance increases receptivity to evidence
  • Framing prevention as normal and protective is more effective than defending it

 

Effective strategies emphasise:
  • Trust
  • Framing
  • Dialogue
 
Key evidence

This approach keeps the conversation collaborative rather than confrontational.

Other Principles

Disclaimer – Professional Communication Tools

The communication principles and practical examples presented on this page are provided for educational and informational purposes only. They are intended to support reflective practice and professional development in the context of dentist–parent communication around preventive oral health care. These materials do not constitute clinical, medical, legal, or professional advice, and they are not a substitute for individual clinical judgement, professional training, or applicable national guidelines, regulations, or standards of care. The International Association of Paediatric Dentistry (IAPD) does not mandate the use of these principles, nor does it guarantee any specific clinical or behavioural outcomes resulting from their application. The examples provided are illustrative and non-exhaustive, and their appropriateness may vary depending on individual circumstances, patient needs, cultural context, and local regulatory frameworks. By using these materials, users acknowledge that responsibility for clinical decisions, professional conduct, and patient communication remains solely with the treating professional. To the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, the IAPD disclaims any liability for loss, damage, or claims arising from the use or interpretation of the content provided.

The Fluoriders campaign is an initiative of the International Association of Paediatric Dentistry (IAPD) designed to promote good oral hygiene habits in children.

The Fluoriders initiative is supported by an educational grant from Colgate’s Bright Smiles, Bright Futures® programme. All educational content is developed independently by IAPD.